|
Post by king on Mar 14, 2008 8:08:52 GMT -5
Now this up for debate again. Terry.... what are you thinking? The Minnesota Twins represent a territiory to the Western state line of Minnesota while the Kansas City Royals go as far as the city limits of Kansas City. Check a map, I believe you will find Minnesota is currently in its rightful home.
|
|
|
Post by Scott on Mar 14, 2008 9:09:45 GMT -5
The Twins are not moving.
The Senators will move to the AL Central and the Brewers will move to the AL East. That is what the game itself decides during this offseason.
|
|
|
Post by Halos on Mar 14, 2008 10:21:46 GMT -5
Now this up for debate again. Terry.... what are you thinking? The Minnesota Twins represent a territiory to the Western state line of Minnesota while the Kansas City Royals go as far as the city limits of Kansas City. Check a map, I believe you will find Minnesota is currently in its rightful home. Haha, your old territory argument. That's alright, I want to keep you in the West so I can take more pleasure in beating you next year.
|
|
|
Post by king on Mar 14, 2008 12:31:20 GMT -5
The Twins are not moving. The Senators will move to the AL Central and the Brewers will move to the AL East. That is what the game itself decides during this offseason. That's cool. The AL West looks to be even stronger next season as Cally ramps back up.
|
|
|
Post by king on Mar 14, 2008 12:32:45 GMT -5
Haha, your old territory argument. That's alright, I want to keep you in the West so I can take more pleasure in beating you next year. And it remains valid... Now the beating me part is going to prove quite cumbersome.
|
|
|
Post by Mosko on Mar 14, 2008 20:03:44 GMT -5
Haha, your old territory argument. That's alright, I want to keep you in the West so I can take more pleasure in beating you next year. And it remains valid... Now the beating me part is going to prove quite cumbersome. I'm okay with the propsed realignment, but your argument that Kansas City Royals support only goes as far west as the KC city limits is absurd. The reality is that most of the states of Kansas and Nebraska are Royals fans.
|
|
|
Post by reds on Mar 16, 2008 12:31:36 GMT -5
And it remains valid... Now the beating me part is going to prove quite cumbersome. I'm okay with the propsed realignment, but your argument that Kansas City Royals support only goes as far west as the KC city limits is absurd. The reality is that most of the states of Kansas and Nebraska are Royals fans. That may be true but I believe the Dakotas are mainly full of Twins fans as well.
|
|
|
Post by king on Mar 16, 2008 14:49:15 GMT -5
I'm okay with the propsed realignment, but your argument that Kansas City Royals support only goes as far west as the KC city limits is absurd. The reality is that most of the states of Kansas and Nebraska are Royals fans. That may be true but I believe the Dakotas are mainly full of Twins fans as well. Correct. And the actual stretch of the fanbase was not my argument, the argument is the geographical coverage the NAME of the team represents.
|
|